How to Use Stop Losses Wisely on the S&P 500

Discover if and when a stop loss can help investment returns. Learn a practical method for managing downside risk in the S&P 500 without sacrificing compounding.

Good morning!

Today, I’d love to learn a little more about you.

Understanding your priorities helps me make this newsletter—and everything I build around it—far more useful to where you’re actually headed.

To help me do that, select the option below that best describes you.
(Responses are private.)

What feels most urgent in your financial life right now?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

I read every response to the newsletter, so if there’s additional context you’d like to share, I’m always glad to hear it.

A quick note before we dive in: this is the final week the 30-day free trial is available for anyone who wants to explore the weekly, in-depth group coaching inside The Wealth Expedition.

It’s designed to guide you from confusion to clarity—without paying thousands per year to a traditional financial advisor. Instead, you get a financial guide, industry insight, and a practical, experience-tested framework for accelerating your path toward financial independence.

If you’re curious, you can check it out here using the coupon code BEGINQUEST.

Now, on to this week’s deep dive—using stop losses for risk management, and when they help versus quietly hurt long-term results.

Have a safe (and hopefully not-too-cold) weekend!

Onward together,

Daniel

📽️ I’ve also covered this topic in a short YouTube video—check it out here.

One Simple Way to Manage Downside Risk

Stop-loss orders are one of the most common risk-management tools in investing.

The logic is deceptively simple: set a price at which you’ll automatically sell, and you control your downside. But most investors use stop losses using gut instinct and arbitrary dollar amounts or percentages.

This sabotages long-term compounding.

And while limiting downside risk, they actually lock in the greater risk of missing out on subsequent gains—and giving up massive potential over the years.

This isn’t about day trading. It’s about understanding when stop losses can help, when they hurt, and whether there’s an optimal level—especially on broad market indexes like the S&P 500.

How Stop Losses Work

A stop-loss order is an instruction to automatically sell an investment once it reaches a set price below the current price. The goal is to limit downside risk.

For example, if an S&P 500 ETF trades at $700 and you place a stop loss 8% below the current price, your sell order triggers around $644. In theory, this protects you from large drawdowns. In practice, effectiveness depends on market volatility and human behavior—which is often where strategies break down.

The Three Drivers of Investment Performance

To understand stop losses, it helps to step back from individual trades and look at the bigger picture. Long-term performance is influenced by:

  1. Position size

  2. Win rate (how often a trade is profitable)

  3. Payoff ratio (average gain relative to average loss)

Stop-loss design directly affects win rate and payoff ratio—often in opposite ways. Higher win rates come with lower payoff ratios, and vice versa.

Why Tight Stop Losses Can Backfire

Tighter stop-loss levels naturally boost the payoff ratio. For instance, if you aim for 30% profits and set a stop loss just 1% below the current price, your payoff ratio is 30:1. You gain 30% when you’re right and lose 1% when you’re wrong—on paper, that looks phenomenal.

But the payoff ratio alone doesn’t tell the full story. Tight stop losses drastically reduce the win rate. A 1% stop on the S&P 500 is almost certain to be hit due to normal day-to-day volatility. In practice, this strategy might only succeed 3–4% of the time, leading to average annual returns near 1% despite the “dazzling” payoff ratio.

The central misunderstanding in many “best stop loss” discussions is this: investors optimize for payoff ratio but ignore win rate. You need both.

Is There an Optimal Stop Loss?

So, is there a level that:

  • Reduces the risk of riding through a bear market?

  • Helps automate decisions and remove emotion?

  • Doesn’t materially harm long-term returns?

Research by Xinyu Xiong, using data from 2000–2005 (the tech bubble crash and recovery), suggests there may be an optimal range for broad market indexes like the S&P 500. Stop losses only become counterproductive when they interfere with normal volatility.

Volatility Matters More Than Fear

The S&P 500 currently has a 3-year standard deviation of roughly 12%. That means about two out of every three years, price movement has tended to stay within ±12% of its 3-year average. Pullbacks of 5%–10% happen often and are normal—part of the cost of equity returns.

The Case for an 8% Stop Loss on the S&P 500

Against that backdrop, a stop loss around 7%–8% below the current price makes sense. It allows normal volatility to occur without stopping you out too frequently.

For example, if the S&P 500 is 700, an 8% stop sits around 644. If the market rises to 730 and then drops 8%, the stop wouldn’t trigger. Pairing this with a take-profit strategy, say harvesting gains at 30%, long-term returns aren’t severely impaired—and may even slightly improve in some cases.

This chart shows the results of various profit-taking strategies on the S&P 500 at different stop-loss widths from 2000-2005. You’ll notice there appears to be an optimal level (for this time period) around the 7%-8% stop-loss width.

The Real Problem: Re-Entry

Where most stop-loss strategies fail is in investor behavior. Most 8% declines recover quickly. Some are shallow pullbacks returning to highs in weeks; others are corrections lasting months.

Re-entering the market is psychologically harder than exiting. Investors often wait for confirmation, better news, or “stability,” ending up buying back at a higher price than they sold. That single behavior destroys the mathematical advantage of the stop loss.

Frequent 8% drops mean an investor could experience 10+ such declines before the stop loss actually protects them from a severe bear market. Without a rules-based re-entry plan, stop losses can do more harm than good.

Who Might Benefit From a Stop Loss

Stop losses aren’t inherently bad. They’re just misused. But strategically implemented, they can add value to an investor’s experience—and in some cases, to their bottom line. They may make sense for:

  1. Investors seeking smoother short-term outcomes
    Accepting slightly lower long-term returns in exchange for avoiding deep drawdowns can be rational, especially if emotional discipline is limited or attempts at market timing is common.

  2. Investors temporarily hedging late-cycle risk
    If you believe markets are in late-stage bull runs, a rules-based stop loss can serve as a temporary hedge, provided you understand its limitations.

  3. Opportunity-focused capital
    Shorter-horizon investments, like funding a business or career transition, can benefit from hedging risk without sacrificing significant upside potential. A partial stop-loss overlay on equity holdings can diversify strategy without replacing a full stock-bond allocation.

Key Warnings

  1. Stop losses are not guarantees. Prices can gap below your stop level, particularly while markets are closed.

  2. Rules matter more than tools. Without a re-entry strategy, a stop loss may add more risk than it removes.

Takeaways

For most long-term investors, tight stop losses are a mistake. They reduce win rates, interrupt compounding, and increase the chance of selling low and buying back higher.

For disciplined investors with clear rules and a defined purpose, a wider stop loss aligned with market volatility can be a useful tool—especially in intermediate-horizon accounts.

The real lesson: the stock market requires accepting discomfort. Avoiding normal downside risk often means giving up extraordinary upside. No stop-loss strategy changes that fundamental truth.

Your Next Step on the Wealth Expedition — When You’re Ready

If you're trying to manage downside risk without undermining long-term compounding, here are two ways to go deeper.

1. Join The Wealth Expedition Membership

Inside The Citadel membership, you’ll gain weekly group guidance along with access to the worlds of Investing Islands, Budgeting Bayou and Entrepreneur Expanse. Each world gives you frameworks, tools, and actionable guidance to map your current position, chart your next steps, and move forward intentionally.

Start Your 30-Day Journey Today! 
(Free trial—no credit card required—simply enter coupon code BEGINQUEST)

2. Get personalized financial planning

If you want help evaluating your current plan, identifying next steps, and building actionable strategies for wealth while balancing risk and lifestyle, I offer personalized planning.
Write me to schedule a free discovery call and get clarity before making your next major financial move.

Wealth isn't just about minimizing downside risk.

It's about making decisions which stack the odds in your favor—carrying you toward your destination on time.

How did you like today's newsletter?

I'm always looking for ways to offer greater value to fellow explorers. Your feedback helps set the direction for future content!

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Daniel Lancaster, CFA

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here.

I’d love to hear from you. Let me know what you’d like to see in upcoming newsletters, articles, or a digital course at Contact Us - The Wealth Expedition.

Follow me on X, Facebook, LinkedIn, or YouTube